Chronological age refers to the number of years an individual has lived since birth. While it is a simple and universally applicable measure, it does not accurately reflect biological function, health status, or aging rate. Chronological age is commonly used in clinical practice, policy, and demographic studies; however, individuals age heterogeneously due to genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors. As a result, chronological age alone is a limited predictor of disease risk, functional decline, and mortality. Aging research increasingly emphasizes the distinction between chronological and biological age to better understand aging processes. Although chronological age remains important for population-level analysis, it is being complemented by biological and functional measures to support precision medicine and individualized aging assessments.
Title : Change your genes – Change your life: Epigenetics of longevity
Kenneth R Pelletier, University of California School of Medicine, United States
Title : Improving mobility and health in over 45,000 humans using nanomedicine
Thomas J Webster, Brown University, United States
Title : An introduction to alchemical facial acupuncture: Sparking the shen
Mary Elizabeth Wakefield, Chi-Akra Center for Ageless Aging, United States
Title : Decoding the secret of longevity through big data: Noncoding RNAs—not proteins—drive animal lifespan evolution
Anyou Wang, DIFIBER LLC, United States
Title : Aspirin guided by coronary artery calcium scoring for primary prevention in persons with subclinical coronary heart disease
Arthur J Siegel, McLean Hospital, United States
Title : When BMI misleads: Integrating body composition, biomarkers, and personalized interventions for cardiometabolic healthspan in aging Asian and European cohorts
Narendra Kumar, HeartbeatsZ Academy, United Kingdom